Update (June 4, 2025, 6:45 am UTC): This article has been updated to add commentary by crypto lawyer Michael Bacina.
Malikie Innovations, a firm that acquired tens of thousands of patents from BlackBerry in 2023, has sued major Bitcoin mining firms Marathon Digital and Core Scientific for using the Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) employed by the Bitcoin blockchain, which it claims to own.
The cases againstย Marathon Digital Holdingsย andย Core Scientificย follow Malikie Innovationsโย acquisitionย of 32,000 โnon-coreโ patents from the communications company and former phone maker, BlackBerry, in 2023.
โThis case centers on ground-breaking innovations in elliptic curve cryptography [โฆ] that years later were recognized and selected by the designers of Bitcoin,โ the filings state.
The lawsuit claims the defendants are using ECC-based cryptographic methods covered under the Malikie-held patents to support their Bitcoin (BTC) mining operations.
Related: Tangem wallet secures US patent for private key transfer tech
Are Bitcoin users in danger?
Aaron Brogan, founder and managing attorney at Brogan Law, told Cointelegraph it is unlikely that such lawsuits will hit most individual Bitcoin users, even if the patents are found to be valid:
โPursuing individuals is trickier because they are often โjudgment-proof,โ which is lawyer jargon for broke.โ
Miners, on the other hand, are wealthy targets that are worthy of a lawsuit. Brogan said โthese entities will always tend to attract lawsuits because they have money, and the patent bar can try to take it from them.โ
If the plaintiffs prevail, they will be able to recover up to six years of lost royalties. The sum to which that translates is not easy to calculate. Such cases often result in a secondary trial, โbut you can reasonably assume it would be a large sum, and it might cause these defendants to enter bankruptcy,โ Brogan added.
Related: Community split on ENS petition against Unstoppable Domains patent
Large-scale consequences
Brogan also noted that winning the case would establish a favorable precedent for Malikie to use in pursuing cases against other miners in the United States. This, in turn, could have disastrous consequences for Bitcoin.
โIf they chose to pursue that strategy, it might undermine the security of the Bitcoin network,โ he said.
Cayman Islands-based crypto lawyer Michael Bacina told Cointelegraph that this is unlikely to be what Malikie is going after. โSo-called โpatent-trollsโ typically do not intend to have claims tested in court, but rather seek to extract a settlement,โ he noted.
Still, Brogan argued that Malikies is more likely to try to extract a fee until the patents expire, rather than tank the entire industry. Niko Demchuk, head of legal at cryptocurrency compliance and forensics firm AMLBot, told Cointelegraph that it was unlikely:
โMalikieโs claim appears not so strong if the asserted patents are expired or cover techniques that predate Bitcoinโs ECC implementation. Even if some patents remain active, their scope is likely limited to specific implementation details, not the core ECC algorithms used in Bitcoin,โ Demchuk said. Still, nothing is certain, he added:
โHowever, the outcome depends on the details of specific patents asserted and the courtโs interpretation of their scope.โ
Bacina also highlighted that if infringement is shown, it still will not be over. He explained that โa second issue will arise, being whether the miners, by using open source, are in fact infringing at all.โ
This is not the first time that intellectual property-related lawsuits have targeted Bitcoin. The bitcoin.org website was able toย reupload a copy of the Bitcoin white paper little over a year agoย after it was taken down during Craig Wrightโs unsuccessful court attempt to prove he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the protocolโs pseudonymous creator.
Wright has worked hard to claim ownership of key parts of the technology behind Bitcoin. In the two years preceding 2019, he had filed 114 blockchain-related patents.
Magazine: Coinbase hack shows the law probably wonโt protect you: Hereโs why
